• How It Works
  • Pricing
  • Blog
  • FAQ
GitRank
  • How It Works
  • Pricing
  • Blog
  • FAQ
Sign InSign Up
GitRank

AI-powered PR scoring platform for engineering teams. Open source and self-hostable.

© 2026 GitRank. CC BY-NC 4.0
Product
  • Features
  • How It Works
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Compare
  • GitRank vs LinearB
  • GitRank vs Jellyfish
  • GitRank vs GitClear
  • LinearB Alternatives
  • Jellyfish Alternatives
Resources
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Documentation
  • Contributing
Company
  • Contact
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
Developer contribution scoring

Contribution scoring that respects the complexity of engineering work

GitRank helps teams move past lines of code and raw commit counts. It scores merged pull requests with a documented model that weighs what changed, where it changed, and whether the work met your quality gates.

Start freeSee how it works

The aim is not to reduce a developer to a number. It is to make previously invisible impact easier to surface, inspect, and discuss with context.

The problem

Raw activity rewards the wrong behavior

Commit counts, ticket volume, and lines of code can be useful operational signals, but they do not distinguish a critical bug fix from low-risk churn. They can also hide review work, mentorship, and quality improvements.

Built for meaningful engineering signals

A clear path from GitHub activity to better decisions

Weight impact deliberately

Prioritize work in critical components and higher-severity fixes through configuration your organization owns.

Keep the evidence attached

Each score stays connected to its pull request, issue links, checks, and AI-generated impact explanation.

See patterns over time

Use distribution and component trends to understand team health instead of chasing isolated totals.

How it works

A contribution score with an audit trail

  1. 1

    Connect the work your team already does

    Install the GitHub App, select repositories, and let GitRank receive merged pull request events automatically.

  2. 2

    Evaluate the contribution in context

    GitRank reads the merged diff, linked issues, component rules, and eligibility requirements before producing an explanation.

  3. 3

    Turn the result into a useful conversation

    Scores, summaries, and trends feed leaderboards, review workflows, bonus programs, and team discussions without relying on raw activity counts.

Practical guidance

What a balanced contribution score should include

  • Impact: how important the problem or component was to the product.

  • Quality gates: whether linked issues, tests, and documentation meet expectations.

  • Context: review work, mentorship, and team conditions that a pull request score cannot capture on its own.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions about developer contribution scoring

Does GitRank score people or pull requests?

GitRank evaluates pull requests. Contributor views aggregate that evidence over time, while preserving the underlying work and its explanation.

Can we customize the scoring formula?

Yes. Teams can configure severity base points, component multipliers, and eligibility criteria to align the model with their product risks.

Should a contribution score be used for performance reviews?

Use it as one source of evidence, never the sole decision-maker. Effective reviews also consider collaboration, role scope, outcomes, and qualitative feedback.

Keep exploring GitRank

How GitRank works

See the merge-to-score workflow in detail.

AI-powered PR evaluation

Learn what GitRank evaluates and explains.

Developer leaderboards

Recognize impact through transparent rankings.

Make shipped engineering impact easier to see

Connect GitHub, configure the rules your team values, and start turning merged PRs into explained recognition.

Start free