• How It Works
  • Pricing
  • Blog
  • FAQ
GitRank
  • How It Works
  • Pricing
  • Blog
  • FAQ
로그인가입하기
GitRank

AI-powered PR analytics that measure developer impact, not just activity.

© 2026 GitRank. All rights reserved.
Product
  • Features
  • How It Works
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
비교하기
  • GitRank vs LinearB
  • GitRank vs Jellyfish
  • GitRank vs GitClear
  • LinearB 대체 서비스
  • Jellyfish 대체 서비스
Resources
  • Blog
  • GitHub
  • Documentation
  • 기여하기
회사
  • Contact
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
Analytics

Measure and improvereview velocity

Track time-to-merge, review turnaround, and bottlenecks. Identify what's slowing down your team and ship faster with data-driven insights.

Start FreeSee How It Works
The Problem

PRs sit in review too long

Without visibility into PR lifecycle metrics, bottlenecks go undetected and velocity suffers.

PRs Sit Too Long

PRs wait days for review while developers context-switch to other work.

Bottlenecks Invisible

You don't know if delays are from review, CI, or back-and-forth.

No Reviewer Data

Can't identify which reviewers are overloaded or fast responders.

Cycle Time Unknown

No baseline metrics to measure improvement or set targets.

How It Works

Automatic velocity tracking

Step 1

Track PR Lifecycle

GitRank captures every PR event via webhooks—opened, first review, approved, merged.

Step 2
Features

Complete velocity visibility

Time-to-Merge Tracking

Track average and median time from PR open to merge. Filter by author, reviewer, or repository.

  • Average and median metrics
  • Filter by author/reviewer
Use Cases

Ship faster with data

Sprint Retrospectives

Problem

Retrospectives lack concrete data about where time was lost.

Solution

Pull velocity metrics showing exactly where bottlenecks occurred last sprint.

Process Improvement

Problem

Hard to prove that process changes actually improved velocity.

Solution

FAQ

Common questions

What metrics are tracked?

We track time-to-first-review, time-to-merge, review rounds, reviewer turnaround, CI wait time, and revision cycles. All metrics can be filtered by author, reviewer, repository, or date range.

How is "velocity" calculated?

Velocity is primarily measured as time-to-merge (from PR open to merge). We also break this down into phases: coding, review, CI, and revision to identify bottlenecks.

Can I set team targets?

Ready to improve your velocity?

Start tracking PR metrics and ship faster with data-driven insights.

Start FreeSee All Features

Calculate Metrics

Time-to-first-review, time-to-merge, review rounds, and reviewer turnaround are calculated automatically.

Step 3

Show Trends

Week-over-week comparisons show if you're improving or regressing. Set targets and track progress.

Step 4

Surface Bottlenecks

Dashboards highlight where time is being lost—waiting for review, CI, or revision cycles.

Velocity Metrics
This Week
Time to First Review
4.2h↓ 12%
Time to Merge
18.5h↓ 8%
Review Rounds
1.3↑ 5%
Bottleneck DetectedWaiting for Review: 65% of cycle time
  • Repository breakdowns
  • Historical trends
  • Review Turnaround Time

    How fast do reviewers respond? Track time-to-first-review and subsequent review rounds.

    • Time to first review
    • Per-reviewer stats
    • Review round counts
    • Approval latency

    Bottleneck Detection

    Automatically identify where time is lost: waiting for review, CI failures, or revision cycles.

    • Phase breakdown
    • Wait time analysis
    • CI impact tracking
    • Alerting thresholds

    Reviewer Load Balancing

    See which reviewers are overloaded and who has capacity. Distribute reviews more fairly.

    • Reviews per person
    • Load distribution charts
    • Capacity recommendations
    • Reviewer availability

    Trend Analysis

    Week-over-week comparisons show improvement or regression. Track progress toward targets.

    • Week-over-week trends
    • Target vs actual
    • Rolling averages
    • Anomaly detection

    Team Benchmarks

    Compare your metrics to organization averages. See how teams stack up against each other.

    • Team comparisons
    • Organization averages
    • Percentile rankings
    • Best practices sharing
    Before/after comparisons show measurable impact of any changes.

    Manager Dashboards

    Problem

    Eng managers need visibility but don't want to micromanage.

    Solution

    High-level velocity dashboards give visibility without individual surveillance.

    Yes, you can set target metrics (e.g., "merge within 24 hours") and track progress. Dashboards show actual vs target with alerts when falling behind.

    Does this integrate with DORA metrics?

    Review velocity metrics complement DORA by providing the "lead time for changes" component. Combined with deployment data, you get a complete DORA picture.